Also, with the CV Rework now fully Implemented, the popularity will decrease. Kamikaze R: It still has a broken concealment īut the Musashi, as Yuro said, is an handicapped version instead of the other way around, because she has colse to zero AA, the guns have 0.3 sigma less than Yamato, i literally think that the popularity was an awful reason for removing her. Imperator Nikolai I: A tiny bit OP for her Tier Belfast: Has literally everything - HE, radar, smoke, hydro Missouri: The only battleship with radar and a god level of credit earning Seriously, I still don't think that the Musashi had any reason to be removed, that however, the other "removed" ships have, here they are: ![]() Sure, the Musashi was really popular, as said by Notser, because she was a ship that players really felt powerfull in and the only smart thing that WG did was to annouce the remouval a couple of months earlier (i wouldn't have had enought coal anyway). I don't think that the Musashi removal made sense from the start, because you don't remove a ship because it's popular whith this way of thinking, then why are ships like Tirpitz, Sharnhorst, Massachusetts, and others, still available? I think they are quite popular, so why aren't they removed? (i'm just being ironic) As support I'll link Notser's video about it, and i agree with everything he says, at the end of the topic. So, since i registered, which is almost one year now, there has been only one thing that i'm still disappoints me (besides the Research Bureau): The Musashi removal "because of it's popularity". Disclaimer: I'm not starting this discussion just because I want the Musashi, it's something more than that.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |